« August 2007 | Main | October 2007 »

September 25, 2007

Banned Books Week

This September 29 through October 6 is “Banned Books Week”.  The American Library Association’s website tells us, “First observed in 1982, Banned Books Week reminds Americans not to take this precious democratic freedom for granted. The event is sponsored by the American Booksellers Association, the American Booksellers Foundation for Free Expression, the American Library Association (ALA), the Association of American Publishers, the American Society of Journalists and Authors and the National Association of College Stores.   It is endorsed by the Library of Congress Center for the Book.”
 
Most books aren’t actually banned as much as they are challenged.  When a book is challenged it is brought up for discussion within a school or library as to whether the book in question should remain on their shelves.  Many different books are banned, or challenged, for a variety of issues.  The most challenged book of 2006, according to the ALA’s website, was “’And Tango Makes Three’ by Justin Richardson and Peter Parnell, for homosexuality, anti-family, and unsuited to age group.”  This children’s book is based on the true story of two male penguins at New York Central Park Zoo that built a nest together and with the help of a zookeeper hatched and raised a baby penguin.
 
To celebrate this very important week, I’m going to list off several books that have been banned or challenged on religious grounds.  I’ve gotten these titles from the wonderfully interesting book, “120 Banned Books” by Nicholas J. Karolides, Margaret Bald, and Dawn B. Sova.  This is a fantastic book and I highly recommend it.
 
Now, some titles that have been suppressed on religious grounds.
 
“The Age of Reason” by Thomas Paine, this is an uncompromising attack on Christianity based on the principles of rationalism.  Um, yeah, Christians disliked this one.
 
“The Analects” by Confucius, this is a collection of sayings and short dialogues attributed to Confucius.  It’s a guide to ethics and morality in personal and political life.  Although Confucius himself was agnostic, a religion developed around his teachings.  Throughout China’s history “The Analects” have been banned in an effort to help Chinese citizens move toward the future.
 
“The Bible”  Don’t even get me started.  But yes, in oh so many places and for oh so many reasons, “The Bible” has been banned or challenged.
 
“Children of the Alley” (sometimes found as “Children of Gebelaawi”) by Naguib Mahfouz, is a history of an imaginary Cairo alley and an allegorical account of the lives of Adam and Eve, Cain and Abel, Moses, Jesus, and Muhammad.  It offers a critique of religious intolerance and political and economic repression.  To sum up, Fundamentalists, particularly of an Islamic leaning, hate this book.
 
“The Koran”, see “The Bible”.
 
“Church: Charism and Power: Liberation Theology and the Institutional Church” by Leonardo Boff, is a collection of essays that argues from his experience with the poor in Brazil that the Catholic Church should transform into a “liberation Church” not simply for the poor but of the poor.  Here’s a fun fact kids, the Roman Catholic Church does not respond to criticism well.  Boff, who was a Friar, was ordered to observe an “obedient silence” for an unspecified period of time.  No writing, teaching, or lecturing.  This lasted for 10 months.
 
“Lajja (Shame)” by Taslima Nasrin, is a documentary novel about the plight of a Hindu family in Bangladesh persecuted by Muslim fundamentalists during an outbreak of anti-Hindu violence in 1992.  Nasrin is an uncompromising critic of patriarchal religious traditions that she views as oppressive to women.  Nasrin, because of her “blasphemy and conspiracy against Islam”, has a fatwa.  That’s the death decree issued by the Council of Soldiers of Islam.
 
These are merely a drop in the bucket.  Who can forget the hooplah over “The Last Temptation of Christ” by Nikos Kazantzakis or “The Satanic Verses” by Salman Rushdie?  By the way, I saw Rushdie on “The Colbert Report” recently, Rushdie is funny, who knew?
 
Remember, as the American Library Association says, “Free People Read Freely.”  Now get out there and read a banned book!

September 15, 2007

First, I'd Like to Thank Jesus for This Blog...

I love Kathy Griffin.  I always have, and I imagine I always will.  I frequently tell people that I want to be the Kathy Griffin of the spirituality set.  I shamelessly use her bits in conversations with friends and family, sometimes even giving her credit.  I love her vicious mocking of celebrity.  On the surface it all seems so simple.  Kathy makes fun of celebrities.  Perhaps, I’m reading too much into her work, but I personally feel there is so much more to it than that.
 
Yes, the bulk of Kathy’s material comes from the examination of celebrities.  She harpoons and deflates the largest stars out there, such as Oprah, Tom Cruise, and Whitney Houston.  This kind of deconstruction of icons to expose their remarkably human flaws, such as vanity and obsession, is actually reminiscent of court jesters of the past.  Those savvy Magical Buffet readers know that the court jester is just another manifestation of the trickster god archetype.  The trickster god mocks those most important members of society to keep them in check.  In those terms Kathy’s humor would be suited for tackling politicians or royalty, but in this day and age, she has chosen to tackle the nearly deific realm of celebrity.
 
That’s why it came as no surprise to me that when given the opportunity to attack the most sacred of celebrity moments, the Emmy acceptance speech, she managed to take it to task.  Much like almost any story she tells about Gwyneth Paltrow.
 
“A lot of people come up here and thank Jesus for this award.  I want you to know that no one had less to do with this award than Jesus.  Suck it Jesus, this award is my god now!”
 
Is there a more perfect parody and take down of this holier than thou validation of celebrity?  Well hold onto your golden statuettes because the ride is about to get bumpy!
 
Responding to pressure from the Catholic League, Kathy’s acceptance speech will be censored in the taped airing of the awards ceremony.
 
“The Academy of Television Arts & Sciences reacted responsibly to our criticism of Kathy Griffin’s verbal assault on 85 percent of the U.S. population.  The ball is now in Griffin’s court.  The self-described ‘complete militant atheist’ needs to make a swift and unequivocal apology to Christians.  If she does, she will get this issue behind her.  If she does not, she will be remembered as a foul-mouthed bigot for the rest of her life,” Bill Donohue, president of the Catholic League, from their website.
 
Now, Jim's, my husband, first response to all of this was, “Does that mean if Atheists raise a stink, the Emmys will edit out any celebrity thanking Jesus?”
 
Funny you should ask.  A quick visit to the American Atheist website will give you this tid bit from their president, Ellen Johnson, “It’s permissible to make religious comments at the Emmy Awards and other public events as long as they do not criticize or threaten the self-appointed ‘Religion Police,’” said Johnson. “Celebrities can go on national television to ‘thank’ Jesus, or Allah, or Scientology for their success, but an Atheist cannot make an honest and forthright statement that their success came from developing their talents and working hard.”
 
In fact, if you click here you can see how American Atheist is rallying support for Kathy.  Better still, you can visit http://suckitjesus.com/. 
 
Here’s a point I want to make.  In no way is she making fun of Catholics or other Christian denominations.  Seriously.  You really have got to want it to think she is.  Kathy doesn’t roll that way.  How do I know?  Well, for all the years of making fun of Tom Cruise, not once has she made fun of his fans.

Also, as Jim pointed out to me, everyone is avoiding the real issue here.  Does Jesus really rig awards?
 
By the way, to learn more about Kathy Griffin, click here.

September 12, 2007

Osama bin Laden+Jesus=Art?

On August 29, 2007 the winner of the 2007 Blake Prize was announced.  According to the Blake Prize website, “The Blake Prize for Religious Art is one of the more prestigious art prizes in Australia. For 55 years it has been awarding a prize for works of art that explore the subject of religious awareness and spirituality.”  This year’s winner was Shirley Purdie and her piece “Stations of the Cross”.  However, the winning piece isn’t what people are talking about.

“The Fourth Secret of Fatima” by Luke Sullivan and “Bearded Orientals: Making the Empire Cross” by Priscilla Bracks are all anyone wants to discuss.  “The Fourth Secret of Fatima” is a statue of Mary wearing a burqa and “Bearded Orientals” pairs a portrait of Christ with one of terrorist Osama bin Laden looking like Jesus.  The inclusion of these two pieces are causing quite a stir in Australia.  To see these pieces click here

Australian Prime Minister John Howard was quoted in “The Daily Telegraph” saying, “The choice of such artwork is gratuitously offensive to the religious beliefs of many Australians.”  Sydney’s Catholic Archbishop, Cardinal George Pell, has been quite vocal with his displeasure, “Some contemporary art is tedious and trivial.  These couple of works demonstrate this.  Regrettably, attempts to insult Jesus and Mary have become common in recent years, even predictable.  Too often it seems that the only quality which makes something ‘art’ is the adolescent desire to shock.  If this is the best the Blake Prize can do, it has probably outlived its usefulness.”  (I have to point out here, that obviously these two pieces weren’t “the best the Blake Prize can do” since a totally different piece won the $15,000 prize.)
 
Enough about the Catholics, what do Australian Muslims have to say about all this hooplah?  Ikebal Patel, the President of the Australian Federation of Islamic Councils offers some unique perspectives.  He is quoted in the “Sydney Morning Herald” saying, “So [Mary wearing a burqa is] no different to how our mothers and sisters are expected to be modest in their dressing.”  He explains that the statue is not at all offensive because both the Virgin Mary and Jesus are revered figures in Islam.  However, Patel was offended in many different ways by “Bearded Orientals”.  “You have a revered prophet of Islam (that would be Jesus) being equated to somebody like Osama bin Laden.  Also in Islam, we don’t have any paintings or drawings depicting any of our prophets, so I find it quite offensive,” he states.
 
Look at all this debate!  The Anglican Bishop of south Sydney, Robert Forsyth, is quoted saying, “Is the one of Mary having a go at religions for oppressing women?”  (My new friends at Roman Catholic Womenpriests, probably have something to say to that!)  According to the “Washington Post”, Bracks (the artist who did “Bearded Orientals” told Australian radio, “I’m interested in having a discussion, and asking questions about how we think about our world and what we accept, and what we don’t accept.”  Reverend Pattenden, Blake Society Chairman, says neither of the two artists had set out to offend anyone, and he was not personally affronted, “They are both works which made me stop and think.”
 
Now I ask you this, isn’t that what art is all about?

September 01, 2007

Today I Prayed For...

I was a big fan of the television show “The West Wing”.  I also loved “Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip” (created by the same guy) but it got cancelled and I’m bitter so I would thank you not to bring that up.  Anyway, there was this amusing little bit in the episode “Debate Camp” that I always liked involving 600,000 Evangelicals praying for C.J. (the White House Press Secretary).  It went like this:
 
BILL STARK
(enters) Excuse me, C.J.

C.J.
Yeah?

BILL STARK
Bill Stark. I'm with "Kingspeak." We're a magazine that reaches over 600,000
Christians Evangelicals. I'm sorry I missed your first briefing. I heard you did well.

C.J.
I can do better.

BILL
I wanted to tell you that on December 10th, all 600,000 will be praying for you.

C.J.
Really?

BILL
That's right.

C.J.
I don't understand.

BILL
Well, once a year, we identify the 365 most influential people in media and we assign each of them a calendar day and we pray for them.

C.J.
I really don't know what to say in response to that sort of kindness.


Later in the episode it comes up once more with humorous results.
 
 
LEO
Not quite. Our report card for our first two weeks in office. The President's approval has gone from 61% during the transition-- when, I suppose, there's nothing to approve-- to 49% once there was. 47% see him as a strong leader-- a result of bungling the Rooker nomination--and African-American support, which basically elected him, has gone from 92 to 78. Finally, if the election were held today, the President would be Chairman of the Economics Department at Phillips Andover Academy. Can anyone report anything good?

C.J.
600,000 Evangelicals are praying for me... so... we have that going for us.

LEO
What the hell are you talking about?

C.J.
It's true-- a guy gave me this card: "365 in Media."

SAM
Who are the others?

C.J.
I don't know, let's see... "Hugh Hefner, Don Imus, Howard Stern..." all the late-night guys.  This is... one, two, three... this is the Editorial Board of The New York
Times. This isn't a good list, this is a list of people who are going to hell!

TOBY
Yes.

C.J.
They're not praying for me because they like me! It's 'cause I'm doomed to eternal damnation!

SAM
Well, if you weren't, it'd be a waste of praying.

C.J.
You're on the list too, pal.

SAM
Can I see that?

LEO
You can all leave.
 
I always found this to be one of those amusing things that seemed real but obviously was not.  Well hold onto your hats because I bring you The Hollywood Prayer Network!  According to their website, “The Hollywood Prayer Network is a non-denominational Christian prayer ministry for the purpose of praying for the people, the projects and the powerful influence of the Entertainment Industry. HPN believes that by mobilizing global prayer we can be a part of God's miraculous work of changing the spiritual climate of Hollywood, from the inside out.”  Here’s where things get totally fun, if you click on the National Media Prayer Breakfast link on their homepage you get taken to here, and you see this!


 
How awesome is that?  There really is a calendar!  I love it!  They really tell you who to pray for each day!
 
Okay, serious time.  I don’t find this offensive at all.  C.J. was right, they are praying for her because they think she’s going to hell (damn liberals!) but it doesn’t change the fact that they’re praying for her.  It’s not like they’re sitting around praying to God for her untimely demise, essentially they’re praying that she allows God to work through her, blah, blah, blah.  Harmless stuff, and certainly not going to hurt anyone.  And besides, it’s totally fun!
 
I hope one day The Hollywood Prayer Network sets aside a day for people to pray for me!

By the way, today is September 1, 2007.  You should be praying for Christina Norman, President of MTV and MTV, and "cultural influencer" Conan O'Brien.


Hosting by Yahoo!